About once a
month I run across a person who radiates an inner light…
I’ve achieved a
decent level of career success, but I have not achieved that. I have not
achieved that generosity of spirit, or that depth of character…
I realized that I
wanted to be a bit more like those people... I was going to have to work harder
to save my own soul.
This year-old New York Times article from David Brooks is
about people who "radiate an inner light" (the people we wish we
could always be around and wish we were). Brooks provides a "moral bucket
list" of things to do in order to acquire that sort of character. The
article likely has one of the following three effects on readers: 1) It's
life-changing. 2) It's abstract and completely boring. 3) It's initially
thought-provoking but ultimately fades into the background after a few days, if
not a few minutes.
The third one is
likely the most common, because the ideas makes perfect sense, but to carry
them out requires substantial dedication and effort. In a world where the norm
is "a self-satisfied moral mediocrity… You figure as long as you are not
obviously hurting anybody and people seem to like you, you must be O.K.,"
many people don't see the point of expending extra energy to love those who
hate them. Yet that kind of selflessness and spirit to serve is exactly what is
required to build a character that shines. Some people find it easier than
others - to forgive, to sacrifice, to smile instead of scream. Even so, it is a
lifelong process for anyone: as Brooks writes, "wonderful people are made,
not born."
Unfortunately, it is
true that "our culture and our educational systems spend more time
teaching the skills and strategies you need for career success than the
qualities you need to radiate that sort of inner light. Many of us are clearer
on how to build an external career than on how to build inner character."
Though I certainly have some teachers who aim to teach more than just facts,
school remains an institution where kids are prepared for the career- and
material success-related aspects of their futures. Schools do not offer classes
on the concepts of selflessness and humility. They do encourage independence
and tell us to follow your dreams. These fundamentally are not
negative ideas; however, they forward what Brooks calls "a vision of life
that begins with self and ends with self." He suggests that instead of
building our lives around our own goals and desires in life, we step back and
consider, "what is life asking of me? How can I match my intrinsic talent
with one of the world’s deep needs?"
It's not the first
time we've heard about the importance of morality and spirituality. But every
other time, the recommended process is deep self-reflection and
self-reconstruction and self-motivation and self-satisfaction. Since that doesn't
seem to be working, maybe we can finally realize that we should just stop thinking so much about ourselves. Instead,
we can focus our energy on others. Derive energy and motivation from loving
others, serving others, making others happy. Yes, your own happiness is
important. Yes, you should take some time to self-reflect. But if you cannot
let go of your self, that inner light
will never grow beyond a dim flicker. That inner light is not a bulb to be
flicked on, in hopes that it will make us brighter or attract others to us; it
is slowly and steadily fueled by exchanges of love and sacrifice, tears and
laughter, conversations and experiences.
Should schools teach
these things? Maybe, though I don't see framing it into a curriculum as being
most effective. Honestly, the simplest way is to teach by doing - specifically,
by kids encouraging this attitude and these actions among themselves.
This sort of mindset
will not make all of the world's problems disappear. The changed attitude of
one person will not butterfly into world peace overnight. But if you are
someone who hopes to someday shine an inner light, you can start by thinking in
terms of everyone around you, not thinking of the whole world in terms of your
self.
No comments:
Post a Comment